<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Password Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/</link>
	<description>My Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 12:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FamousPhil.com Admin Blog and More :: Social Networking– Common Sense Practices</title>
		<link>http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-4354</link>
		<dc:creator>FamousPhil.com Admin Blog and More :: Social Networking– Common Sense Practices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 03:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famousphil.com/blog/?p=310#comment-4354</guid>
		<description>[...] information could be retrieved by a third party is if you use a very simple password.  I wrote a password security blog a while back that somewhat details what I’m getting to.  Typically, a lot of computer users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] information could be retrieved by a third party is if you use a very simple password.  I wrote a password security blog a while back that somewhat details what I’m getting to.  Typically, a lot of computer users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alonzo Larabel</title>
		<link>http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Alonzo Larabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famousphil.com/blog/?p=310#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Wonderful submit! I’ll subscribe at the moment wth my feedreader application!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful submit! I’ll subscribe at the moment wth my feedreader application!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norma Gottron</title>
		<link>http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Norma Gottron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famousphil.com/blog/?p=310#comment-838</guid>
		<description>Can come on dude, these facts* and proof* i indicate who&#039;s posting* lol :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can come on dude, these facts* and proof* i indicate who&#8217;s posting* lol <img src='http://famousphil.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Famous Phil</title>
		<link>http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Famous Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famousphil.com/blog/?p=310#comment-635</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always been taught that more is better, but theoretically, you&#039;re correct. My huge passwords could be hacked with much shorter versions.

That is a chance that I have to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always been taught that more is better, but theoretically, you&#8217;re correct. My huge passwords could be hacked with much shorter versions.</p>
<p>That is a chance that I have to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://famousphil.com/blog/2009/09/password-security/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://famousphil.com/blog/?p=310#comment-634</guid>
		<description>25 chars?  anything over 16 is theoretically redundant for md5, or 20 for sha-1.  ie, there will be a password under those sizes with the same hash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 chars?  anything over 16 is theoretically redundant for md5, or 20 for sha-1.  ie, there will be a password under those sizes with the same hash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: famousphil.com @ 2012-05-19 13:00:59 by W3 Total Cache -->
